An AMH value of 0.6 ng /ml is
bad, really bad. In the report I got in hand, it was written that, an AMH value
of less than 1.6 ng/ml might indicate a poor response to ovarian stimulation. I
was heartbroken and angry; my reproductive life is nearing its end! I expected
it, but I didn’t expect such a drastic fall in my AMH. After I returned home
with the results, I called Rajender. He was cool as a cucumber. He said, I read
about women who produce eggs even with much lesser values. I was irritated by
his positivity; I thought, why won’t he leave me in peace, take an alternate
solution (donor eggs) and move on. I had no energy to argue with him or break
his enthusiasm. Dr. Malpani gave me one more suggestion. He asked me, from
which lab did you measure AMH. I told him that I got it measured from
Thyrocare. He replied, Thyrocare is not so reliable, please measure your AMH
again from SRL (Ranbaxy)! I was not hopeful, but I was badly in need of a
miracle. I gave blood to SRL for AMH and Vitamin D measurement and waited for a
couple more days.
From now on, this post will turn
a bit more scientific. Many of you might
wonder why I measured Vitamin D along with AMH. Is it necessary? What is the
rationale behind that? There is a connection between Vitamin D and AMH. AMH
gene (the sequence of our DNA which codes for AMH protein) has a Vitamin
D-response element (a region which is responsive to the presence of Vitamin D
in a positive manner). To put it in a more simple way, Vitamin D can bind to
the AMH gene and increase its expression.
If this is so, can low Vitamin D level lead to low AMH levels in blood?
When they initially found the presence of Vitamin D-response element in the AMH
gene of prostate cancer cell line, frenzied researchers, as usual, hyped out of
proportion the importance of Vitamin D in reproductive biology. Their understanding was and still is, if high
AMH levels in blood indicate good ovarian reserve, increasing AMH levels by
increasing Vitamin D intake, especially when one is deficient, (since Vitamin D could increase AMH level) will
lead to good ovarian reserve too. What a simple way to solve the problem of
poor ovarian reserve! Just pop in Vitamin D, and the problem will be solved!
But, this kind of (il)logical reasoning without understanding the basics of the
science of AMH is half-witted! To read more about the science of AMH please
refer to: http://myselfishgenes.blogspot.de/2012/08/amh-paradox.html
It is true that Vitamin D could
increase AMH levels. But increasing the expression of AMH from the already
existing follicles (antral follicles) cannot increase ovarian reserve. More
antral follicles lead to more AMH production, but increasing your AMH levels
artificially (either by taking substances which increase AMH production, like
Vitamin D, or by injecting AMH into your body) cannot increase your ovarian
reserve. Actually, increasing your AMH level artificially, could lead to opposite
effect - high AMH can decrease the amount of antral follicles available for FSH
stimulation. So, if you are having poor ovarian reserve, taking Vitamin D is
unlikely to help and in worst cases it can bring down your antral follicle
count (AFC) too. In case, if your
Vitamin D levels are low, or if you are Vitamin D deficient, your AMH levels might
be artificially lowered even though your ovarian reserve is good (there is no
solid proof for this statement!). And, this is the reason I measured my Vitamin
D levels too when measuring AMH.
After two days, I got my blood
test reports from SRL. My AMH level was 1.6 ng/ml and my Vitamin D levels was
17ng/ml, while the minimum recommended Vitamin D level in blood is 20ng/ml. Need
not to say that I was happy and hopeful again. A value of 1.6 appeared very great when
compared to 0.6. My thoughts used to
wander, and I would wonder, which lab result is correct! But, as per natural human tendency, my mind decided to stick with the more promising
value. I had only 12 more days for starting
the stimulation. I was waiting for my periods so that I can measure my antral
follicle count (AFC). I knew well that, AMH value could only be interpreted
sensibly with antral follicle count (AFC). I was afraid, yet eager to know my
AFC! I was wondering, what if there were only few antral follicles left!
You might ask whether I took
Vitamin D to correct my deficiency. Again, I have a very different view of the
whole Vitamin D story. I was in India, I was getting ample sunshine. I had no
signs of Vitamin D deficiency. I read somewhere that 99% of Indian population
is Vitamin D deficient. This kept me wondering! If 99% of Indians contain a
particular range of Vitamin D in blood, then, which is the normal range for that
population ( whether the value which occurs in 99% or the one in the remaining 1%) ? There are not enough studies
to show the normal range of Vitamin D for a healthy, Indian population. No one
still knows how Vitamin D is processed by our body. People who live in places
where sun light is meager, must have or must need mechanisms to store Vitamin D
in body, so that they can utilize it during days where sunlight is not
available. But, do people who live in tropical regions like India have such
mechanism? If not, then what should be their normal blood levels? Nobody has
the answer for these questions. After, all the initial hype about Vitamin D,
and connecting its deficiency to almost all the diseases in the world, researchers
have recently started to understand that, measuring Vitamin D or supplementing
Vitamin D to a healthy person is not advisable. As more randomized clinical
trials are performed, the results of such studies shows that there is no
benefit of Vitamin D supplementation whatsoever, and some studies even showed a
negative effect (17% increase in kidney stones!). For further reading: To
[Vitamin] D or Not to D? That Is the Question. After considering
everything, I decided to not take Vitamin D. Since I had only 12 more days to start
the stimulation, I was too chicken to change anything in my body drastically! Vitamin
D has the ability to change the expression of 3000 different genes (not only
AMH!) in our body and I didn’t want to take any invincible risks.
My periods arrived after making me to panic a little! Have you
ever noticed this - when you don’t need it, it comes on time and when you are
waiting for it there will be no sign of it? I went to a nearby scan center to have
my antral follicles counted on day 3 of my menstrual cycle. I was too nervous. I entered the scanning room
and there stood a lady doctor and her assistant. I told them that they must
measure my antral follicle count, ovarian volume and make sure my uterine lining
is thin and the cavity is free from any abnormality. She asked me where the doctor’s prescription was. I said, I don’t have one, I do my IVF in Mumbai and
my Dr emailed me that I should measure all this. She looked at me
uninterestingly and said, we do only follicle tracking studies. I had no energy
to argue with her or teach her about IVF and the importance of measuring AFC!
She was not ready to hear any of my lectures too; there were so many people
waiting outside. She was still looking at me as an unwanted intrusion. The assistant
was smirking. I felt so helpless and then I literally pleaded them, please do
what I say. Since I have to do IVF, I need all these details. I must say that the scanning machine they had was excellent. The lady doctor counted my antral follicles.
Unable to control my curiosity, I asked her, do I have antral follicles. She
said 8 on one side and 10 on the other. I was so happy; I forgot how they
behaved with me. With a broad smile I thanked them and came out, ignoring their
strange looks. I waited for some time to get the results in hand. From the
beautiful picture of my ovary they gave me, I counted my AFC once again. The
result read: one of the ovaries is bulky – possible PCOD! I was too happy to
have PCOD or anything that could give me more follicles and more eggs. I thanked
my ovaries. Immediately after reaching home, I conveyed the results to my hubby
and Dr. Malpani. I started to eagerly look forward to go to Mumbai- our happy
vacation after staying away from each other for so long !
I am so happy to hear this! Keep the faith! Fyi - For my AMH test, Mackay Memorial Hospital utilized Ansh Labs - http://www.anshlabs.com/. Not sure how it works for SRL or Thyrocare? Do they utilize a third party provider as well?
ReplyDeleteThanks Nio :)
DeleteI am a regular reader of your blog.
ReplyDeleteaccording to my experience of taking DHEA and the egg quality(not the egg number) now your egg will be of better quality and also 80% of your egg gives you babies. DHEA does not work well for PCOD. You want a good quality embryo not many eggs with bad quality. I am 100% sure that you will have your genetically babies. I am very confused that you are a biological scientist and worried about your eggs and seeking donor egg. At your age i am 100% sure that you will get your genetic babies. Do not worry, be happy and enjoy your ivf cycle.
Thanks a lot for your kind words !
DeleteDHEA might help some. Previous cycle I took DHEA for 7 months (3 years back !). This time I didn't take any. But, when one uses DHEA, 80% of eggs will be genetically normal is an overrated statement.
My eagerness to use donor eggs is not because of the fact that my eggs will not be good. I am going through this IVF journey for 7 years and have gone through 7 IVFs and several FETs; it is very frustrating for the body and mind. I am 36. I thought if donor eggs could help me get a baby sooner and if there are less chance for miscarriage and high chance for having a healthy baby, why not chose it, instead of suffering like this ! Just some fear of the unknown ! Might be just because I am a scientist in biology and know much about the effect of age on egg quality, I am getting paranoid :)